TECHNICAL AND MARKETING SERVICES
FOR INSTRUMENTATION SUPPLIERS AND END-USERS
Non-Contact Radar Level Measurement (Part 3 of 3)by David W Spitzer and Walt Boyes
Radar sensor geometries generally include parabolic, cone/horn, stick/rod, and stilling well designs. Parabolic sensors are typically large (over 8-inch) and produce a strong radar beam with a relatively small beam angle that can measure large distances and/or exhibit custody transfer performance. Cone/horn sensors can be installed in nozzles as small as 2-inch and exhibit good performance. Some stick/rod sensors can be inserted into yet smaller nozzles but generally produce radar beams with relatively large beam angles. Stilling well systems can also be installed in relatively small nozzles and should be considered when the liquid in the vessel is turbulent. Stilling well systems provide a calming effect while containing radar energy to produce a more focused beam in the stilling well.
The material itself can cause the intensity of the reflected radar signal to degrade when the material exhibits poor reflective qualities. Notwithstanding other problems, radar level measurement is typically limited to materials with a dielectric constant greater than approximately 1.5. Liquids with lower dielectric constants do not reflect well and may cause the level measurement to be erratic or fail to operate. FMCW radar level measurement systems can typically operate at lower dielectric constants as compared to pulsed radar level measurement systems. Notwithstanding the above, some non-contact radar level measurement systems can measure the level of materials having dielectric constants as low as 1.05.
Radar level instruments often can measure through foam, so their measurements generally represent the level of the material. However, applications have been reported where the foam either attenuated the radar return signal too much to permit a measurement or was able to cause a large enough "spurious" return to an erroneous level in the vessel.
Excerpted from The Consumer Guide to Non-Contact Level Gauges.
Technically Speaking: Of Reynolds Numbers, Laminar Flow & Straight-Pipe Requirements by David W Spitzer
Internet postings are often amusing. I recently came across such a posting that said (paraphrasing to protect the innocent) that differential pressure flow sensors need to be located a certain length downstream of pipe bends and restrictions (such as control valves) to ensure that the flow is more laminar and more predictable. This statement reads reasonably well to the casual observer but tends to lose its luster under scrutiny.
Most flowmeters, including differential pressure flowmeters, do need to be "located a certain length downstream of pipe bends and restrictions (such as control valves)". Similarly, the "certain length" does make the flow measurement more predictable. However, technically speaking a "certain length" could mean (say) 3 meters. In flow measurement, we tend to express these upstream requirements as multiples of pipe diameters, so the "certain length" could be (say) 2 meters for one pipe size and (say) 3 meters for another pipe size. This is a relatively minor point as is that the "certain length" is inferred (but not stated) to be straight pipe because it is downstream of pipe bends and restrictions.
However, the statement that the flow is more laminar indicates that the writer does not understand the concepts involved with the laminar, transitional and turbulent flow regimes. This is not uncommon and is encountered in virtually every flow seminar that I teach. Approximately 60-80% of my (non-chemical engineer) students proudly raise their hands when asked if they have heard of Reynolds number. Typically, only 1 or 2 students raise their hands halfway when I ask if they know what Reynolds number is.
Reynolds number is a dimensionless number that is the ratio of the inertial forces in the pipe to the viscous forces in the pipe. In general, the flow is in the laminar flow regime when the viscous forces dominate, the turbulent flow regime when the inertial forces dominate, and the transitional flow regime between the laminar and turbulent flow regimes. These flow regimes are dependent on the flowing conditions and pipe size, and not dependent on the piping configuration.
The laminar, transitional and turbulent flow regimes should not be confused with velocity profile distortion issues that can be caused by upstream pipe fittings and restrictions. There are a number of techniques that can be used to address velocity profile distortion --- including the installation of upstream straight run.
This article originally appeared in Flow Control magazine.
Variable-Speed Energy Savings by David W Spitzer
Reducing the motor speed of a constant torque pump reduces the energy consumption of the motor. When the motor is operated at 80 percent speed, what is the approximate motor energy consumption expressed as a percent of the full speed motor energy consumption?
A. 80 percent energy
B. 65 percent energy
C. 50 percent energy
D. None of the above
Variable speed drives are increasingly applied in many applications to reduce energy consumption.Reducing the speed of a centrifugal pump reduces the pump discharge pressure by the square of its speed and its energy consumption by the cube of its speed.Even a small speed reduction such as 5 percent can save almost 15 percent of the energy consumed at full speed.
Such is not the case of constant torque loads such as positive displacement pumps and positive displacement compressors. The capacity and energy consumption of constant torque equipment are both approximately proportional to operating speed. Therefore, at 80 percent speed, the motor will consume approximately 80 percent of its full speed energy consumption. Answer A is correct.
At 80 percent speed, the load will operate at approximately 80 percent of its capacity while consuming 80 percent of its full speed energy. These relatively simple relationships for positive displacement equipment make the operating speed and energy consumption considerably easier to predict as compared to centrifugal equipment.
Additional Complicating Factors
Many variable speed drive applications and installations require attention to detail to ensure that the motor and its mechanical equipment can function properly in operation. In addition, failure to attend to certain details of lower speed operation can damage the equipment --- especially when variable speed drives are applied to positive displacement equipment.
This article originally appeared in Flow Control magazine.
ABOUT SPITZER AND BOYES, LLC
In addition to over 40 years of experience as an instrument user, consultant and expert witness, David W Spitzer has written over 10 books and 500 articles about flow measurement, level measurement, instrumentation and process control. David teaches his flow measurement seminars in both English and Portuguese.
Spitzer and Boyes, LLC provides engineering, technical writing, training seminars, strategic marketing consulting and expert witness services worldwide.
ISSN 1538-5280
Copyright 2025 Spitzer and Boyes, LLC
The content of this message is protected by copyright and trademark laws under U.S. and international law. All rights reserved.